Fitness Myth: You Burn the Same Calories Walking or Running

February 5, 2009 · Comments

There is a common saying going around that you burn just as many calories walking a mile as you do running a mile. I’ve heard this countless times and due to the repetition, have come to believe it. However, it seems that this is just another fitness myth propagated down from semi-experts to the masses. A recent study at Syracuse University found that men burned 124 calories while running and only 88 calories while walking at the same distance. The corresponding numbers for women were 105 and 74 because they happened to weigh less. So what exactly causes this distinction between running and walking?

When you walk, you keep your legs mostly straight, and your center of gravity rides along fairly smoothly on top of your legs. In running, we actually jump from one foot to the other. Each jump raises our center of gravity when we take off, and lowers it when we land, since we bend the knee to absorb the shock. This continual rise and fall of our weight requires a tremendous amount of Newtonian force (fighting gravity) on both takeoff and landing.

The researchers also provided us with a handy equation (see below) that we can use to determine exactly how many calories we expend as a factor of our weight, distance jogged, and intensity. Next time guys, try not to be so gullible, ok?

Running: .63 x your weight x miles = net calories burned
Walking: .30 x your weight x miles = net calories burned

link – Runner’s World

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Ty

    We should account for skill too. Most people walk more than they run, so it stands to reason walking would be more efficient. Pro runners would run more efficiently and expend fewer calories per distance. Not necessarily fewer than walking, but the gap would be narrowed. How do we eliminate that variable?

  • Chucky

    I hope you didn't imply that every reader of your blog are gullible! :) I would also think by just employing basic physics that running is better with regard to calories burnt per distance.  Several factors are going to determine how much energy you burn but basically it boils down to two things: (i) what distance you move a specific weight and (ii) how high (also a distance) you move that weight.  

    For running and walking the distance that you move a specific weight (your own weight) is the same, but with running you have an additional 'burden' to move your weight vertically (i.e. lifting your legs more).  A physicist would be able to tell you this without having to do an experiment to prove it.  

    However, one thing you didn't mention which is quite important is that we have evolved to walk. That is why we are more efficient at it.  This also holds true for one's joints.  Walking is much better than running in this regard.

    You should walk about 1.4 times a running distance to burn the same amount of calories.  If you run on average about 13 km/h (approx 8 mi/h) and walk on average 6 km/h (approx 3.8 mi/h) it indicates that you should walk 3 times longer than you would have to run.

    I would suggest:  Go out, walk for an hour to an hour and a half daily...it will give you time to think about life and relax.  It will be easier on your joints.  A relax mind is a much more productive mind.  

    This is an important lesson for obese and morbidly obese people as running is almost impossible for them and they feel that they can't get into the whole exercise 'thing'.  Just go out and walk.  You'll feel much better about yourself.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: